|
 |
The
effective fiber and rumination
What is Effective Fiber:
The term “effective fiber” can be defined as the ability
of a fiber source to stimulate rumination. Various metabolic disorders
can result if minimum effective fiber levels are not met. At low fiber
intake, rumination decreases and thus, saliva production decreases,
rate of passage from the rumen slows down and rumen motility can be
decreased. These factors can results in rumen acidosis which will
lead to decreased feed intake, decreased dry matter digestibility,
laminitis and rumen parakeratosis. Milk fat depression is also associated
with insufficient rumination. The three major characteristics of a
feed source that contribute to its effectiveness at stimulating rumination
are: chemical composition (fiber level), functional specific gravity
and particle size.
Effect of Chemical Composition on Rumination:
Rumination activity is directly related to the NDF content of a feed.
The NDF component is made up of three major constituents: cellulose,
hemicellulose and lignin. Of these three, cellulose and hemicellulose
are potentially degradable by the rumen microorganisms. Lignin provides
rigidity to the cell wall of plants and is the most limiting factor
to nutritional availability and digestibility of fiber by rumen microorganisms.
As plants mature, the proportion of lignin relative to the total fiber
content increases. This means that the rumen bacteria are able to
digest less fiber and the cow will have to spend more time ruminating
feed to allow it to pass out of her rumen.
Diets containing high fiber forages are likely to inhibit intake.
In ruminants, the volume of the rumen limits feed intake. Furthermore,
a cow will only ruminate for approximately 11 hours per day. If the
cow is unable to reduce the particle size of the ingested fiber sufficiently
over a 24 hour period, passage out of the rumen will be slowed. As
a result, intake will be depressed until the fiber can be ruminated
to a size that will pass out of the rumen.
The protein content of a feed is also a factor to consider. The rumen
available protein is degraded to ammonia, which can affect the buffering
capacity of the rumen and alter rumen pH. In addition, enough protein
needs to be available to maintain high microbial growth rates. If
degradable protein is not available to the microbes, ruminal fiber
digestion may be depressed because of decreased microbial growth.
Effect of Specific Gravity on Rumination:
Functional specific gravity is another important characteristic of
forage particles that contribute to their effectiveness. At an early
growth stage, the size of the plant cell becomes fixed. As maturation
occurs, the cell wall will thicken, become more rigid and intracellular
space will decrease. This thickening will cause an increase in the
specific gravity of the plant cell (i.e. cell becomes more dense).
The specific gravity of a forage particle can only be changed when
the cell structure is collapsed. This occurs during mechanical grinding,
pelleting or rumination.
Particles in the rumen tend to be stratified in relation to their
specific gravity. The lighter particles float at the top and probably
get caught up in the rumen mat. The heavier particles sink straight
to the bottom of the rumen and are very unlikely to be ruminated.
There are many factors that influence the functional specific gravity
of a particle. Particle size is a major factor. As particle size of
forage decreases, its specific gravity increases. Part of the function
of rumination is to reduce the particle so that it has an appropriate
size and specific gravity to pass out of the rumen. This is how long
hay escapes the rumen and does not remain floating at the top forever.
Read
more about Rumen Physiology and Rumination
Particle Size
Rumination is the main source of feed particle size reduction. Mastication
during eating and microbial digestion also reduce feed particle size,
but to a much lesser extent. The average particle size leaving the
rumen via the reticulo-omasal orifice is less than 1mm. As the majority
of the feed entering the system is much larger than that, it is easy
to see the great importance of rumination. Recently attention has
been focused on optimal feed particle size for two major reasons.
One, TMR mixing frequently results in particle size reduction of forages.
Secondly, the smaller the particle size of a forage, the more likely
it is to undergo an optimal ensiling fermentation. Another issue with
forage particle size is that very fine particles will increase rate
of passage through the rumen thus increasing intake, at least initially.
However, this is accomplished at the expense of digestibility, since
residence time and microbial exposure are shortened. A strong direct
relationship between particle size and rumination time has been well
documented. There is also strong evidence to indicate that particle
size plays a significant role in the maintenance of rumen health.
Many studies have demonstrated the relationship between reduced particle
size and the increased incidence of milk fat depression. As particle
size decreases, rumen pH and acetate: propionate ratios tend to decrease
as well, suggesting rumen health and productivity will be compromised.
The particle size at which rumen health is maintained is widely discussed
but remains undiscovered. Varying research suggesting critical particle
sizes of anywhere from 6.4 mm to 9 mm to between 10 and 20 mm illustrates
how little is currently known.
Read
more about Penn State Particle Size Separator
What are the cows saying?
The ultimate judge of particle size adequacy is the dairy herd.
As mentioned previously, the reason for providing effective fiber
is to maximize ruminal health and digestible DMI. Not only does
maximal rumen health lead to overall cow health, but also production
of both milk and milk components tend to be more efficient. Microbial
protein production is an end goal in both ration formulation and
feeding management. In order for ruminal microbes to thrive, grow
and supply both lower tract protein needs and volatile fatty acid
production for energy needs, the rumen pH needs to be maintained
at approximately 6.0 (5.8-6.2 range). Grant et al. (1990) showed
that when rumen pH was below 6.0 the growth of cellulolytic bacteria
was significantly depressed. This of course led to an increase in
propionate producing organisms and a decrease in the acetate (precursor
to butterfat):propionate ratio.
The simplest observation to make within a herd is the cud-chewing
activity of cows. This is a sound index relative to fiber mat and
effective fiber status. Cows to be observed for this activity should
be those that are in a resting phase (either standing or laying)
following a meal activity. The minimal goal is that 40% of these
cows are actively and aggressively chewing. In herds where effective
fiber is “ideal”, the common observation is 50-70% of
cows actively and aggressively chewing. Remember that cows have
a physiological drive to ruminate and will do so even with an inadequate
rumen fiber mat and low effective fiber intake. As a result, simply
observing an acceptable proportion of cows ruminating isn’t
necessarily a sign that effective fiber intake is adequate; the
cows must be ruminating vigorously as well.
Other observations that can be made within a herd relative to effective
fiber status are such things as:
- Manure consistency – passage of both concentrate and fiber
particles, is feed being digested as expected?
- Incidence of “off-feed” cows, is indigestion a significant
issue?
- Lame cows resulting from sub or clinical laminitis – do
key personnel involved in herd hoof trimming programs have an active
voice in effective fiber “evaluation”?
- Milk components – are milk butterfats and/or proteins at
levels that indicate sound rumen health? Is the ratio of between
the two acceptable or are there >10% butterfat: protein inversions?
- Are peaks acceptable but then followed by poor persistency?
- Are haircoats rough?
- Are cuds being found in the feedbunk or do farm personnel claim
cows are “vomiting”? (a sign of rumination in spite
of low effective fiber intake.)
- Are DM intakes inconsistent and do they fluctuate significantly
day-to-day?
Rumenocentesis:
Another tool used by many in the nutrition and veterinary communities
to evaluate ruminal health and factors that may be leading to undesirable
pH levels is rumenocentesis. This is not a universally accepted
practice, but one that the author has used for troubleshooting,
and a practice that many feel is based upon sound science and does
have field application. Nordlund, Oetzel and co-workers at the University
of Wisconsin have been the leading researchers of this topic over
the past few years. An excellent review of the logistics, evaluation
and herd testing procedures for rumenocentesis is found in the Journal
of Dairy Science, 1999. 82:1170-1178. Key values summarized in this
review are:
- The pH of ruminocentesis samples should be 5.5 or higher
- At least 12 cows should be sampled within a pen to provide a representative
set of observations
- 3 or more of the 12 cows at or below the 5.5 cut-off value is
a sign of acidosis
Nutritional consultants and veterinarians can use rumenocentesis
as a quantitative tool to show producers that rumen health is being
compromised and that ration and/or feeding management changes need
to be implemented. As with many consulting “tools” the
use of this information can allow for a “teachable”
moment with a producer and prod a producer to take action.
Read Full
article at MilkProduction.com
More about this topic:
Particle Sizing: A Tool for Evaluating Forages
and Total Mixed Rations
JERRY D. OLSON, D.V.M., MS
Balancing Rations for Forage Quality
C.E. Coppock, Ph.D.
Effective Fiber in Barley-Based Diets
K.A. Beauchemin and L.M. Rode, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
|