back to homepage
back to homepage contact us
About Technology Benefits Case Studies The market Links
Research
The effective fiber and rumination

What is Effective Fiber:

The term “effective fiber” can be defined as the ability of a fiber source to stimulate rumination. Various metabolic disorders can result if minimum effective fiber levels are not met. At low fiber intake, rumination decreases and thus, saliva production decreases, rate of passage from the rumen slows down and rumen motility can be decreased. These factors can results in rumen acidosis which will lead to decreased feed intake, decreased dry matter digestibility, laminitis and rumen parakeratosis. Milk fat depression is also associated with insufficient rumination. The three major characteristics of a feed source that contribute to its effectiveness at stimulating rumination are: chemical composition (fiber level), functional specific gravity and particle size.

Effect of Chemical Composition on Rumination:
Rumination activity is directly related to the NDF content of a feed. The NDF component is made up of three major constituents: cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Of these three, cellulose and hemicellulose are potentially degradable by the rumen microorganisms. Lignin provides rigidity to the cell wall of plants and is the most limiting factor to nutritional availability and digestibility of fiber by rumen microorganisms. As plants mature, the proportion of lignin relative to the total fiber content increases. This means that the rumen bacteria are able to digest less fiber and the cow will have to spend more time ruminating feed to allow it to pass out of her rumen.
Diets containing high fiber forages are likely to inhibit intake. In ruminants, the volume of the rumen limits feed intake. Furthermore, a cow will only ruminate for approximately 11 hours per day. If the cow is unable to reduce the particle size of the ingested fiber sufficiently over a 24 hour period, passage out of the rumen will be slowed. As a result, intake will be depressed until the fiber can be ruminated to a size that will pass out of the rumen.
The protein content of a feed is also a factor to consider. The rumen available protein is degraded to ammonia, which can affect the buffering capacity of the rumen and alter rumen pH. In addition, enough protein needs to be available to maintain high microbial growth rates. If degradable protein is not available to the microbes, ruminal fiber digestion may be depressed because of decreased microbial growth.

Effect of Specific Gravity on Rumination:
Functional specific gravity is another important characteristic of forage particles that contribute to their effectiveness. At an early growth stage, the size of the plant cell becomes fixed. As maturation occurs, the cell wall will thicken, become more rigid and intracellular space will decrease. This thickening will cause an increase in the specific gravity of the plant cell (i.e. cell becomes more dense). The specific gravity of a forage particle can only be changed when the cell structure is collapsed. This occurs during mechanical grinding, pelleting or rumination.
Particles in the rumen tend to be stratified in relation to their specific gravity. The lighter particles float at the top and probably get caught up in the rumen mat. The heavier particles sink straight to the bottom of the rumen and are very unlikely to be ruminated.
There are many factors that influence the functional specific gravity of a particle. Particle size is a major factor. As particle size of forage decreases, its specific gravity increases. Part of the function of rumination is to reduce the particle so that it has an appropriate size and specific gravity to pass out of the rumen. This is how long hay escapes the rumen and does not remain floating at the top forever.
Read more about Rumen Physiology and Rumination

Particle Size
Rumination is the main source of feed particle size reduction. Mastication during eating and microbial digestion also reduce feed particle size, but to a much lesser extent. The average particle size leaving the rumen via the reticulo-omasal orifice is less than 1mm. As the majority of the feed entering the system is much larger than that, it is easy to see the great importance of rumination. Recently attention has been focused on optimal feed particle size for two major reasons. One, TMR mixing frequently results in particle size reduction of forages. Secondly, the smaller the particle size of a forage, the more likely it is to undergo an optimal ensiling fermentation. Another issue with forage particle size is that very fine particles will increase rate of passage through the rumen thus increasing intake, at least initially. However, this is accomplished at the expense of digestibility, since residence time and microbial exposure are shortened. A strong direct relationship between particle size and rumination time has been well documented. There is also strong evidence to indicate that particle size plays a significant role in the maintenance of rumen health. Many studies have demonstrated the relationship between reduced particle size and the increased incidence of milk fat depression. As particle size decreases, rumen pH and acetate: propionate ratios tend to decrease as well, suggesting rumen health and productivity will be compromised. The particle size at which rumen health is maintained is widely discussed but remains undiscovered. Varying research suggesting critical particle sizes of anywhere from 6.4 mm to 9 mm to between 10 and 20 mm illustrates how little is currently known.
Read more about Penn State Particle Size Separator

What are the cows saying?
The ultimate judge of particle size adequacy is the dairy herd. As mentioned previously, the reason for providing effective fiber is to maximize ruminal health and digestible DMI. Not only does maximal rumen health lead to overall cow health, but also production of both milk and milk components tend to be more efficient. Microbial protein production is an end goal in both ration formulation and feeding management. In order for ruminal microbes to thrive, grow and supply both lower tract protein needs and volatile fatty acid production for energy needs, the rumen pH needs to be maintained at approximately 6.0 (5.8-6.2 range). Grant et al. (1990) showed that when rumen pH was below 6.0 the growth of cellulolytic bacteria was significantly depressed. This of course led to an increase in propionate producing organisms and a decrease in the acetate (precursor to butterfat):propionate ratio.

The simplest observation to make within a herd is the cud-chewing activity of cows. This is a sound index relative to fiber mat and effective fiber status. Cows to be observed for this activity should be those that are in a resting phase (either standing or laying) following a meal activity. The minimal goal is that 40% of these cows are actively and aggressively chewing. In herds where effective fiber is “ideal”, the common observation is 50-70% of cows actively and aggressively chewing. Remember that cows have a physiological drive to ruminate and will do so even with an inadequate rumen fiber mat and low effective fiber intake. As a result, simply observing an acceptable proportion of cows ruminating isn’t necessarily a sign that effective fiber intake is adequate; the cows must be ruminating vigorously as well.
Other observations that can be made within a herd relative to effective fiber status are such things as:
- Manure consistency – passage of both concentrate and fiber particles, is feed being digested as expected?
- Incidence of “off-feed” cows, is indigestion a significant issue?
- Lame cows resulting from sub or clinical laminitis – do key personnel involved in herd hoof trimming programs have an active voice in effective fiber “evaluation”?
- Milk components – are milk butterfats and/or proteins at levels that indicate sound rumen health? Is the ratio of between the two acceptable or are there >10% butterfat: protein inversions?
- Are peaks acceptable but then followed by poor persistency?
- Are haircoats rough?
- Are cuds being found in the feedbunk or do farm personnel claim cows are “vomiting”? (a sign of rumination in spite of low effective fiber intake.)
- Are DM intakes inconsistent and do they fluctuate significantly day-to-day?

Rumenocentesis:
Another tool used by many in the nutrition and veterinary communities to evaluate ruminal health and factors that may be leading to undesirable pH levels is rumenocentesis. This is not a universally accepted practice, but one that the author has used for troubleshooting, and a practice that many feel is based upon sound science and does have field application. Nordlund, Oetzel and co-workers at the University of Wisconsin have been the leading researchers of this topic over the past few years. An excellent review of the logistics, evaluation and herd testing procedures for rumenocentesis is found in the Journal of Dairy Science, 1999. 82:1170-1178. Key values summarized in this review are:
- The pH of ruminocentesis samples should be 5.5 or higher
- At least 12 cows should be sampled within a pen to provide a representative set of observations
- 3 or more of the 12 cows at or below the 5.5 cut-off value is a sign of acidosis
Nutritional consultants and veterinarians can use rumenocentesis as a quantitative tool to show producers that rumen health is being compromised and that ration and/or feeding management changes need to be implemented. As with many consulting “tools” the use of this information can allow for a “teachable” moment with a producer and prod a producer to take action.
Read Full article at MilkProduction.com

More about this topic:

Particle Sizing: A Tool for Evaluating Forages and Total Mixed Rations
JERRY D. OLSON, D.V.M., MS

Balancing Rations for Forage Quality
C.E. Coppock, Ph.D.

Effective Fiber in Barley-Based Diets
K.A. Beauchemin and L.M. Rode, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada


Contact us | © VocalTag